Lexicon of Arguments

Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
I 299
Unconscious/Chalmers: only a small part of the information of human cognition seems to correspond to the information of conscious experiences. Most of it is unconscious. If the two-aspects principle applies unreservedly, then the "unconscious" information is realized in experiences, but not in our experiences! (>Panpsychism,> Thermostat), e.g. if we assume that individual neurons can have experiences of me like a thermostat.
>Experience, >Consciousness/Chalmers.
I 300
The overall system of my brain is then only a system of a set of systems, namely that which has the global control.
>Systems/Chalmers.
Evolution has shaped such systems to form a coherent cognitive structure.
Brain: when we accept this, we can also assume that different sets of experiences take place in a set of information spaces.
Then I may have a number of related but slightly different phenomenal relatives from processes in my brain.
>Information/Chalmers.
This follows only from the unrestricted two-aspect principle.
>Aspects.
The alternative is to limit this principle so that the amount of physically realized information spaces is reduced, preferably by limiting how information is processed.
I 301
Criterion: for a "real" information processing the criterion might be the strength of the signal, or the type of causation.
Cf. >Information Processing/Psychology.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.