Lexicon of Arguments

Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
Esfeld I 149
Social Externalism/Esfeld: is implied by social holism, since the convictions are at least partly determined by the social environment. >Individuation. (Scientific camp: Tyler Burge, 1979(1)).
Burge: E.g. suppose all internal factors of a person remain the same, while the social environment is varied. >Twin earth.
I 149/159
This allows to show that the environment contributes to the content of the convictions of a person. The opposite position is what Burge calls "individualism" ((s) The thesis that the convictions do not depend on the environment.)


1. Tyler Burge: 1979. Individualism and the Mental. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 4: 73–121.

---
Frank I 29
Externalism/Burge: tries to reconcile this with Descartes: no conflict between E. and perception-independent self-consciousness:
what determines the thought contents also determines what the thinking subject thinks about them. (Common cause).
To think the thought one does not need to know the enabling conditions. It is enough that they are fulfilled.

Frank I 664
Externalism/Burge: but there is another way in which external factors are introduced into the determination of the content of thought: "thought experiment" (Davidson: happens to be true for me):
For example, until recently, I believed arthritis was a joint inflammation resulting from calcium deposits. I did not know that any joint inflammation, like gout, is also considered to be arthritis.
When a doctor told me (falsely) that I have gout, I thought I had gout, but not arthritis.
Burge: e.g. let us imagine a possible world in which I am physically the same, but the word "arthritis" is actually applied only to calcium-induced joint inflammations.
Then the sentence "gout is not a form of arthritis" would be true and not false.
The corresponding conviction would not have been the wrong belief that gout is not a form of arthritis (but it is wrong), but a true conviction about a disease other than arthritis.
But in that world all my physical conditions and my behavior are the same as in this world.
My conviction would have changed, but I had no reason to believe it, and so in such a case I would not know what I believed. Davidson pro.
Burge: That depends on the fact that a concept is only imperfectly mastered and yet a content is believed. >Objects of belief, >Objects of thought, >Mental states, >First Person, >Incorrigibility.
Fra I 665
But this is common for a large number of expressions.


Donald Davidson (1987): Knowing One's Own Mind, in: Proceedings and
Adresses of the American Philosophical Association LX (1987),441-4 58

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.