Lexicon of Arguments

Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
VI 127f
Future/QuineVsAristotle: E.g. "tomorrow’s sea battle": tomorrow’s sea battle does not exist. Therefore there are no statements about it. Not even the statement that "it is not true now"... -assumes 1) omniscient God - 2) determinism - is incompatible with our freedom of action.
Freedom/Quine: we do what we decide to do - whether decisions are determined is not the issue - Sentence of the Excluded Middle: is definitely valid but is at most, incomplete - ambiguous propositions are not true, but the corresponding propositions - Completion: does not lie in the future, though - ((s) ...but lies in information - truth value: can be left open, but not the meaning of the sentence.)
>Excluded Middle/Quine.
VI 129
Pro three-valued logic: truth value, and not whether the sentence makes sense, would depend on the existence of the unicorn - as it should be - Vs: Problem: there are too many truth-function combinations.
>Truth Values/Quine.
XIII 73
Future/Quine:
XIII 74
Question: are sentences about the future neither true nor false (without truth value) until the matter is decided?
Aristotle: pro. This is still supported today by some theologians.
Future/Theology: if a sentence about the future is already true today, God must know it, but then determinism also follows from it. But that is a different kind of determinism than the one discussed under "freedom of will".
Problem: then people can no longer act freely and free action is a prerequisite for praise and blame, sin and grace.
Quine: I hope the reader is not convinced by my presentation of the argument.
Prediction/future/statement/solution/Quine: Thesis: statements about the future are true or false when made, however capricious or unfounded they may be.
Advantage: only if we accept this, we can treat time and space on one level. Namely, time as the 4th dimension.
Ethics/Morality/Time/Future/Quine: also for the moral discussion we get advantages from it: Example
Dilemma: a) Environmental protection benefits people as well as the unborn,
b) Birth control benefits the environment. But with this we deny the rights of the unborn.
Four-Dimensionalism/future/past/resolution/Quine: Thesis: future and past objects and people are just as real as present ones.
XIII 75
Timeless: timelessly spoken, unborn babies are just as real and their interests are to be respected in the same way.
Birth control: people who are never born because of it are a fiction. Such people do not exist, not even timelessly! Ethics/Morality/Future/Non-Existence/Quine: in this way nobody's right is violated by birth control.
Four-Dimensionalism/Possibilia/Quine: four-dimensionalism creates a place in the sun for all future actualities, however unpredictable, but it is no consolation or help for mere possibilities.
Actual/Possibilia/Quine: the rights of the non-updated are contingent on their actualization.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.