Lexicon of Arguments

Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
II 228f
Name/object/direct speech/quote/tradition/Searle: e.g. the sheriff spoke the words "Mr. Howard is an honest man".
II 231
For the traditional conception the direct speech here involves no words (but names of words do).
>Description level, cf. >Indirect speech.
II 232
SearleVsTradition: of course we can talk about words with words.
>Metalanguage.
Also, no new names are created here, the syntactic position often not even allows to set up a name.
II 233
E.g. Gerald said he would Henry (is ungrammatical). Solution: a simple repetition of the words, not the name of a proposition.
>Proposition.
III 229
Disquotation: disquotation is not sufficient for the analysis of a fact: e.g. that this object is red.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.