Lexicon of Arguments

 Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
VI 60
Characters/signs/Carnap: three kinds: 1. the character itself (enclosed in double quotes, for example if its spelling will be discussed) - 2nd argument character (in brackets) if its meaning is at stake - e.g. the notion ‹7›. (We can also use ›VII›, but not ‹5+2›: 3. meaning characters (brackets) e.g. "[7] is odd" - here we can also use [5 + 2] and [VII].
Habermas III 373
Signs/Carnap/Habermas: after Karl Bühler viewed the complex of symbols only functionally, Carnap made it accessible under syntactic and semantic aspects of an internal language analysis. It is not the isolated sign that carries meanings, but elements of a language system, i.e. sentences whose form is determined by syntactic rules and whose semantic content is determined by the reference to designated objects or facts.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.