Lexicon of Arguments

 Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
I 75
Transcendental Naturalism/TN/McGinn: Definition "scientific sentence": so we shall call a sentence whose meanings do not produce specific philosophical confusions, but which refers to puzzling objects.
Then we can say that the answer to the body-soul problem is constituted in a number of scientific sentences, which are not accessible to any human according to transcendental naturalism, or if they were conceived by a living creature, that would not trigger in them a feeling of a philosophical mystery.
>Mysticism/McGinn.
---
II 72
Science/McGinn: does it obey a grammar? Perhaps the ability to combine is a fundamental property?
  Three aspects:
  1. basic smallest elements "atoms".
  2. laws to their combination.
  3. The resulting complexes. (McGinn, formerly "CAlM" combinatorial atomism with lawlike mappings).
>Terminology/McGinn.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.