Lexicon of Arguments

 Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
Rorty VI 219
Research/Standards/McDowell: it is just the wit of the standards of research, that their compliance increases the probability to get closer to the the world as it is, the "suchness"!
RortyVsMcDowell: again leading to a false distinction of scheme and world.
>Scheme/content/Davidson, >World/thinking/McDowell.
McDowell, who accepts Davidson's critique of the differentiation scheme/content, denies this.
James would ask: what difference in behavior would it make?
>World/William James, >Pragmatism/William James.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.