Lexicon of Arguments

Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
Stroud I 130
Knowledge/skepticism/KantVsDescartes: Who reads a proof needs to know at the end.
Problem: this is only possible in the sciences, not in philosophy.
KantVsTradition: Kant treats knowledge of the outer world always indirectly or inferentially.
Solution/Kant: immediate perception / = consciousness of external things. That is a sufficient proof of their reality. - With inferential access skepticism would be inevitable.
Per skepticism: forces to show that we have acquired our knowledge.
KantVsMoore/Stroud: Moore does not show this.
I 134
Skepticism/Kant: is refuted only by a proof of realism.
>Reality/Kant, >Perception/Kant, >Experience/Kant, >Realism/Kant, >Skepticism.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.