Lexicon of Arguments

Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
McDowell I 177
PutnamVsDavidson: when the cause-effect description is complete, then the sounds that we utter, cannot be more than a mere "expression of our subjectivity".
RortyVsPutnam: Putnam understands by a "declaration of X" still a synopsis, the synthesis of external and internal position.
Representatives of disquotation believe that people can only be described in a behaviorist manner. But why should it be impossible to consider supplements by normative representations? (Putnam's philosophy was ultimately traditional.)
>Disquotation, >Behaviorism, >Norms/Putnam.
McDowell I 177
Causality/Putnam: the desire to tell a story about the causal relationships of human pronouncements and environment, does not rule out that one invents a story, after the speakers are expressing thoughts, and make assertions, and try to not make mistakes.
These stories are then eventually not distinguishable.
>Causal theory of knowledge, >Pragmatism.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.