Lexicon of Arguments

Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
I 159
Definition Propensitiy/Popper/Fraassen: Thesis: according to this, probability is itself a physical quantity, the strength or intensity of the real chance of an occurrence or event that cannot be reduced by reference to actual classes of actual occurrences.
I 165
Probability/Fraassen: a) epistemic: e.g.
1. 75% of the recruits of 44 have survived.
2. Jones is recruit 44 - 1 and 2 are objective.
But the probability is subjective for me, because I have no further information about Jones.
N.B.: the information that I sum up has not the word "probability" in itself.
Information: that Jones belongs to a certain class. Thus, statistical mechanics has nothing to do with ignorance either.
I 166 f
Objective Probability/Fraassen: For example, information about the time a system spends in a state is objective information. To call a probability function a measure for something is neither subjective nor objective.
It can also be a measure of ignorance.
Objective and subjective (epistemic) probability cannot always be kept apart in practice.
I 167
Statistics/probability/infinite/Fraassen: because subregions can be subdivided into even smaller parts ((s) why? - Because they end up as points) one needs infinite classes. -> Kolmogoroff axioms (countable additivity). - In order to map probability onto real numbers. - Still there is an extrapolation of finite proportions.
I 169
Probability/Quantum mechanics/Fraassen: Problem: Meaningless: half-life of a single atom. - Also for odd numbers of atoms (due to the decay of a half atom). - Solution: subjective probability. I have no further information on this atom. - Problem: objectively accurate ½, subjective: about 1/2 - Problem: there is no relation between exact and approximate!
Solution: in quantum mechanics there is no classic probability.
I 170
Mixture/Quantum mechanics: Contrary to pure state: - analog in statistical mechanics: Difference between micro- and macro-state. - Ignorance: to say that the system is in one of e.g. three pure states. - (Ignorance interpretation) - Problem: mixed state: can be decomposed in more than one way.
I 174
Probability/Double Slit/Quantum mechanics/Fraassem: must not be equated with the proportions, to find the electron in a certain place. >Quantum mechanics.
I 177
Infinite/Probability-Theory/Quantum Mechanics/Fraassen: problem: there are so many pure states and maximal observables as there are real numbers. >Observation, >Experiment, >Method.
Probability-Theory: Theorem: if each of a class of mutually exclusive events has a probability > 0, there are only countable many.
Problem: then modality comes into play; the probabilities are about what would be the case if ...
I 178
Epistemic probability/subjective/Fraassen: can be left to the epistemology.
Objective probability: is a philosophical problem. - What does a probabilistic theory say? - To what are we bound to with this? >Theories.
I 179
Probability Space:
1.K: sample space, event-R,
2.F: family of events,
3.P: Probability measure. - Significance: Problem when too fine-grained.
Definition field: family of subsets of K, completed under the operations average, union, complement formation.
Probability Space: if Field = Borel-Field (Sigma-Field): completed under countable infinitely many unions. - + + Propensity, strict frequency. >Propensity.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.