Lexicon of Arguments

Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
I 289
Understanding/Tugendhat: Understanding the usage rule of an assertoric sentence: not knowing the circumstances, but know in what capacity it is used.
>Language use, >Circumstances.
((s) This is not use theory, because this refers to word meanings).
>Use theory.
I 308
Understanding/TugendhatVsMeta Language: Understanding is not expressed in a meta language - but in mastering the sign rules.
>Metalanguage/Tugendhat, >Metalanguage.
I 489
Understanding/singular Term/Tugendhat: we understand a singular term only if we know to which other types it refers - but not a circle, but complementary.
>Singular Terms, >General terms, >Predicates.
I 495
Understanding/Tugendhat: by Leibniz law of identity, the equal sign is not defined - one can say that his understanding is demonstrated when one can infer from the truth of "Fa" to the one of "Fb" - but with that the circumstances are not shown.
>Leibniz principle, >Equal sign.
Criteria/identity criterion/Tugendhat: shift to object area.
>Criteria, >Identity criteria, >Identity conditions.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.