Lexicon of Arguments

 Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
~ passim
TugendhatVsCircumstances: Circumstances cannot be an explanation, otherwise lie, deception, error would be excluded.
I 209ff
Circumstances Tugendhat: If they determined the importance, all predicates would be quasi-predicates - not circumstances determine the meaning, but rules of use, namely through function.
I 227
Function asks: "how", not "under which circumstances".
Cf. >Use theory.
I 221
TugendhatVsCircumstances as explanation of meaning (no rule possible) - VsIndicating Definition. If circumstances influenced the meaning, there would only be quasi-predicates.
>Ostensive definition, >Definitions, >Predicates.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.