Lexicon of Arguments

Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
Cresswell II 146
Belief/Prior/Cresswell: Thesis: Belief should not be considered a predicate of that-sentence - but instead believes-that should be seen as a syntactic unit that is applied directly to a sentence.
Cf. >That-sentences, >Predicates, >Beliefs, >Objects of thought, >Objects of belief.
- - -
Prior I 6f
Belief/Prior: no adequate approach without distinction between mind state of belief and that which is believed (state/content).
>Belief state/Perry, >Mind state.
Prior: in case of false beliefs: instead of non-existing object: attribution: E.g. Othello attributes infidelity to Desdemona.
>`Attribution, >Predication, >Non-existence.
PriorVsRussell: Problem: above it is abstract loyalty.
>Abstract objects, >Abstractness.
In case of falsity, the belief relation would then need to have an additional position (to the true fact).
>Relation theory.
I 11
False Belief/Russell: false facts fail in truth-making.
>Truthmakers, >Facts.
Montague: points in the wrong direction.
>R. Montague.
PriorVs: not for a neutral observer.
>Intentionality, >Thinking.
I 27
Belief/Prior: belief is no relation - E.g. ...that nothing is perfect: there is no object.
>Generality, >Generalization.
I 53
Belief Function/Prior: E.g. X believes that ... is not identical in identical propositions: e.g.

...is a bachelor/...is an unmarried man.

although one may feel that the propositions are self-identical.
I 81
Belief/Prior: you do not have to believe rightly that you believe something.
>about/Prior)
You can also simultaneously believe p and not-p.
You can believe something contradictory.
E.g. the fear that God will punish you for your disbelief.
>Thinking, >Logic.
You can find out that you did not believe what was thought you believed. - If someone believes what he says when he says that he mistakenly believes that it is raining, then this belief is not necessarily mistaken.
>Error, >Deception, >Falsehood, >Levels/order, >Description levels.
No epistemic logic ist necessary, propositional calculus is sufficient.
>Epistemic logic, >Propositional calculus.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.