Lexicon of Arguments

Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
I, 43f
Tropics: individual properties as basic building blocks of reality - then no accidentals but substances.
>Accidens, >Substance.
Vs: linguistic determinations surpassed, "revisionary" ontology: must depict language as irrelevant.
>Ontology.
I 45
Group individual: e.g. "the first three chancellors" - constituents: all possible combinations - but: Adenauer's head part of Adenauer, but not a (constitutive) part of the group.
>Constitution, >Mereology, cf. >Sets, >Set Theory,
>Comprehension.
I 56f
Def INDIVIDUAL/Meixner: individual-like objects: Example "the round square", but also e.g., Sherlock Holmes, fictitious persons and their parts of the body, of which it cannot be said whether they have certain properties or not - "the man who knew that he knew nothing": not Socrates, but INDIVIDUAL (overdetermined: knowledge/ignorance).
>Fiction, >Knowledge, >Predication, >Attribution,
>Individuals/Meixner.
I 56
Def (initial property-wise) complete: e.g. numbers: we cannot say that they smile or do not smile.
>Numbers, >Nonsensical.
I 57
Def initial property-wise maximally consistent/Meixner: entities that are ee ee complete and not ee overdetermined - Def maximally consistent/Wessel: (external): a set of formulas that are consistent and no further consistent formulas exist. That is, that any addition of another formula makes the set inconsistent.
>Overdetermination, >Consistency, >Properties/Meixner.
Def maximally consistent/Meixner: of every individual property, the INDIVIDUAL contains either that one itself or its negation.
>Continuous determination/Kant.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.