Lexicon of Arguments

 Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
Rorty I 38ff
WrightVsTarski: he did not succeed to specify a standard.
>Truth/Tarski, >Definition of truth/Tarski, >Theory of truth/Tarski.
Wright: there are two standards: legitimate assertibility and truth.
>Truth, >Assertibility.
Difference: the pursuit of one is necessary also a striving for the other, but a success in one is not necessarily a success with the other.
---
Wright I 85
VsWright: Tarski requires bivalence, assertions can also be undecidable.
(Vs Platitude: assertion = putting something forward as true).
>Bivalence, >Tarski scheme, >Decidability.
WrightVsVs: the deflationismus precisely does not accept the (disquotation scheme).
>Deflationism, >Disquotation.
There are no problems with indefinite truth values, but with additional ones or gaps.
>Multivalued logic, >Truth value gaps.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.