Lexicon of Arguments

Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
Frank I 132f
Subjectivity/Nagel(1): the fact that it is somehow avoids the attribution of a separate aspect such as quality.
>Properties, >Qualities, >Qualia, >Attribution, >Aspects.
NagelVsReductionism: the way something is cannot be reduced.

1. Thomas Nagel (1974): What Is It Like to Be a Bat?, in: The Philosophical
Review 83 (1974), 435-450

- - -
Nagel III 116 ff
Subjective/Objective/Gradual/Nagel: so the distinction is relative! (Polarity, continuum, respects: space, time, opportunities, scales). - E.g. a universal human perspective is more objective than that of an indidvidual, but less objective than a physical one.
>Perspective/Nagel.
Subjectivity: not necessarily something private.
>Intersubjectivity.
Objectivity: you cannot approach it by expansion of the imagination.
III 120
Problem: for physical objectivity, the subject depends on those of its own components that it deems most suitable.
>Objectivity/Nagel.
III 28ff
Subjectivity/Completeness/Objectivity/Reality/Nagel: since scrambled eggs taste like something for a cockroach and we will never know how (because we cannot imagine), we must say: either
a) that the subjective qualities are not part of reality (absurd) or
b) that not everything that is real is part of the objective world.
Reality/Nagel: thesis: reality is not only the objective reality.
>Reality, >Reality/Nagel.
III 30
The world is neither my world nor ours. (This does not even apply to the mental world).

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.