Lexicon of Arguments

Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
II 61
Identity/time/self/I/Nozick: because it is highly conceptual, a scheme appears to be necessary.
>Identity conditions, cf. >Qua objects.
This scheme should choose between near and immediate successors, etc.
>Next successor/Nozick, >Similarity metrics, >Similarity.
But I do not need the scheme to find out my goals, but to find out whose goals are mine.
>Self-knowledge, >Self-identification.
Problem: who applies actually the scheme?
II 78
Definition I/self/some authors: to be an I or to be self, means to have the ability of reflexive self-reference.
>I, Ego, >Self, >I/Nozick.
NozickVs: 1. This ability must just have existed sometime
2. beings: from the fact that I have this ability, it does not follow that it is essential.
In addition: the reflexive self-reference gives me access to the self, but that does not guarantee that it is part of my nature as self.
>Self-reference.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.