Lexicon of Arguments

Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
I 255
Regress/Malcolm: (according to Rorty): models for conformity generate regresses: if you are asked, how do you know e.g. that the seen dog agrees with the idea of a dog, one must ask how do you know that it’s a case of conformity.
>Correspondence, >Correspondence theory.
I 255
Ryle: Here you have to be satisfied with the sentence, "he sees it." Nothing "Para Mechanical" can improve our understanding of perceptual recognition. > Perception/Fodor.
I 264
Regress/Rorty: the argument of duplication is simply due to a bad question. (VsMalcolm and Ryle "How is motion possible?" "Why does nature follow natural laws?" ("How-is-it-possible"-questions).

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.