Lexicon of Arguments

 Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
I 78
Meaning/Grice/reduction/psychology/semantics/Avramides: Question: must the analysis use psychological terms which are not based on the semantic concepts first analyzed?
>Meaning theory.
Loar: yes, you can analyze propositional attitudes without semantic concepts of public language.(1)
>Meaning theory/Loar.
In what sense is the psychological more fundamental than the semantic? - There are several different types of asymmetry.
Griceans: hope for scientific discoveries in the future.
AvramidesVs: that already anticipates further reduction to the physical.
>Reductionism.


1. Brian Loar (1981). Mind and Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.