Lexicon of Arguments

 Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
I 129f
Def Rationality/Luhmann/Reese-Schäfer: the bid to respect the functional differentiations. This is ompletely different to Habermas.
LuhmannVsHabermas: overall societal rationality can finally not exist in the generalization of what all the individual functional areas see as their rationality.
For this purpose, there can be no privileged place, no responsible organization, so no 'constitution'.
---
AU Kass 8
Rationality/Luhmann: question: how can rationality be understood under the realistic conditions of universal deceit at all?
Tradition: Thesis: action and circumstances are both natural - also the criteria for correctness.
AU Kass 8
Rationality/Habermas: distinction strategic/communicative rationality.
LuhmannVsHabermas: the rationality should be the same rationality on both sides. Why are we talking about rationality then?
But what is the common component? - Neither Habermas nor Weber say that.
>Rationality/Habermas, >Rationality/Weber.
Luhmann: Today: rationality of action: preferences - antonym: side-effects.
>Action/Luhmann, >Action system/Luhmann, >Action theory.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.