Lexicon of Arguments

Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
I 72
Physics/Field: Thesis: everything we need, are ordinary physical objects and an entity with geometric and electromagnetic properties.
>Ontology.
I 76
Physics/Field: only describes the actual world - not the possibilities.
>Actual world/Lewis, >Actuality, >Possible worlds.
I 100
Physics/mathematical entities/truth/applicability/Field: Physics requires only the logical truth
(iii *) PB (if MB, then M (B * & AXM))
(see the text).
((s) conditional; anyway modal).
Not an assertion like AM, claiming the existence of mathematical entities.
Conclusion: instead of conservatism, consequence and strong consistency we need the modal analogues of these concepts - then no mathematical entities - and no metalogical terms are needed.
>Conservativity, >Mathematics/Field, >Mathematical entities, >Modal logic.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.