Lexicon of Arguments

 Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
II 308
Vagueness/indeterminacy/logic/"reject"/Field:
Def Rejecting: is not accepting the negation.
Moderate non-classical logic/Field: should be defined without "reject": it does not accept any instances of the Law of the Excluded Middle, but also does not accept the negation of any instance.
>Excluded middle, >Negation.
Reject: the sense of rejecting should be less than the meaning of "accepting the negation". - But it must in turn be stronger than "not accept".
>Stronger/Weaker.
Def "reject p": "accept that it is not the case that determined p".
"Low" acceptance should be more than "not high".
If the threshold is >acceptance, then rejecting is stronger than non-accepting.
Assumed, belief degrees in a sentence and its negation add up to less than 1, then: rejecting is weaker than accepting the negation.
>Belief degrees.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.