Lexicon of Arguments

Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
V 58
Science/morals/appearance/Kant/Rorty: that modern science describes a world without morals, is so, according to Kant, because it only describes phenomena.
>Morals/Kant.
V 69/70
Morality/ethics/psychology/psychoanalysis/Rorty: what metaphysics does not make, also cannot be made by the psychology - also Freud has no explanation of "moral motives".
>Morals/Freud.
V 78
Morals/content/Hegel/Rorty: the moral standpoint has no content. >Principles.
V 89
Morality/justice/universality/Rawls/Rorty: a general moral concept can not provide the basis for a public concept of justice - instead: conflicting and incommensurable concepts must be taken into account.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.