Lexicon of Arguments

Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
I 430
Correct/True/Truth/Correctness/Reference/Tugendhat: a speech event is only called a right (correct), when another one is called correct. - Then it has the sense of "true" - that constitutes the reference to objects.
>Reference, >Truth.
I 441
Correctness/Language/Tugendhat: E.g. signal language of animals or humans, rules causal or conventional, then the use is considered "right" - then classification expressions = quasi-predicates (only in presence of the object).
>Predicates/Tugendhat, >Terminology/Tugendhat, >Animals, cf. >Animal language.
I 442
Regardless of the situation: when the perceptual situation is specified by spatio-temporal localization and is thus objectified.
I 444
If the observer speaks a situation-independent language, he can respond to a situation-dependent language (e.g. of measuring instruments) with the attribution of truth/falsehood.
>Observation language, >Objectivity.
I 445
Truth: if the speaker only has quasi-predicates, he would have to be able to distinguish between regulatory compliance and situation conformity - then correcting errors about verification rules.
I 446
But by definition not if only quasi-predicate available - Solution: singular term, then constancy of an identifiable.
I 519
"right"/Tugendhat: is a basic concept.
>Basic concepts.
I 448
Truth/Correctness/Tugendhat: the false use of a term (lie) presupposes that it is used in a rule-compliant way.
>Truth.
Therefore it is necessary to separate correctness and truth. - It must be possible to refer to other situations with singular terms and quantifiers.
>Singular terms, >Quantifiers.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.