Lexicon of Arguments

Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
II 64
Contingent/Necessary/Predicate/Cresswell: suppose predicate P is contingent and applies to the objects a1, a2...
N.B.: we can convert this contingent predicate into a necessary predicate:
Necessary/Predicate: Q: should necessarily apply to precisely those objects to which P applies contingently.
Solution: Q: "is a1 or a2 or is..."
Meaning: the meaning of these two predicates is of course not the same, but it would have to be, because they apply to the same set of things.
>Extensionality.
Could there be two such predicates? Some perception predicates seem to work like this.
E.g. Suppose the set of red and round things happened to be the same set - but the internal patterns (devices) in recognizing subjects are different.
>Perception, >Attribution, >Observation, >Observation language, >Observation sentence.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.