Lexicon of Arguments

Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
I 38
Logical Consequence/Cresswell: crucial difference to the entailment: it combines forms of sentence or sentence schemes ((s) no content, not sentences).
>Entailment, >Conditional, >Material conditional.
It is not a question of which propositions are involved and what are the truth values of the individual sentences.
Propositions, Truth value.
Entailment: if all the worlds where p and q are true, are exactly those, where p is true, then that means in this particular case, that p entails p u q.
>Possible worlds.
That q follows from p intensionally.
>Intensions.
Logical consequence: but p u q is not a logical consequence of p, because there are ways to ascribe truth values to p and q that make p true, but p u q wrong.
>Valuation.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.