Lexicon of Arguments

Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
I 17
Conjunction/Aristotle: Problem: white and man can be composed to white man. - That's fine.
But: not "good" and "cobbler".
Compound noun: cannot occur as the subject of a predication: E.g. lawyer-politician: then neither: "Every S is a scoundrel" nor "Some S are honest" as conjunction of predications, by first inserting "lawyer" and then "politician".
>Predication, >Attribution, >Predicates, >Properties, >Statements.
But this does not show that a conjunction is not a sentence.
>Sentences/Geach.
False: "God and Plato are two wise men".
Solution/Geach: You do not have to decide whether none or "not all ..." occur in a class. Conjunction: is not a pair of sentences! E.g. "Smith hears that Browns wife is unfaithful."
Negation of the conjunction: ~(p u q) = (plq), not both.
I 258
Conjunction/Sentence/Frege: "p u q" is a sentence that is different from "p" and "q" alone.
Mill: ditto: otherwise "a group of horses" as "a kind of horse".
But not: E.g. "Jim is convinced and his wife is unfaithful."
Solution: "the fact that..." is always to be split as a pair of statements.
>Facts/Geach.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.