Lexicon of Arguments

 Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
I 151
Compositionality/PinkerVsFrege: The question of compositionality must also consider the type of connection.
>Syntax, >Grammar.
I 153
Different: baby saw chicken/chicken saw baby - this shows that the building blocks are not separated.
>Surface structure, >Deep structure.
I 154f
Neural networks/thinking: active/passive, units.
Baby eats: does not say what - snail is eaten does not say by whom.
Wrong solution: relevance.
>Relevance.
Correct solution: representation.
>Representation.
For this there is an aditional layer of units. Similar to Mentalese.
>Mentalese/language of thought.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.