Lexicon of Arguments

Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
Baraldi I 89
Communication/Luhmann/GLU: specific operation of social systems:
1) Communication
2) Information
3) Understanding the difference between communication and information.
Communication is not the same as information, it only happens when information is understood - information is a selection between what is said and unsaid.
Understanding is selection between communication and information.
>Understanding/Luhmann, >Information/Luhmann.
- - -
Reese-Schäfer II 47
Society/Communication/Luhmann/Reese-Schäfer: Special case: only society operates with communication. - There is no communication outside of society. - Therefore, it is necessary closed. - This is the only system for which this is true. - Then no observer can take an outside standpoint.
>Society/Luhmann, >Observation/Luhmann.
- - -
AU Cass 13
Communication/Language/Karl Bühler/Luhmann: instead of "transmission model": - unity of three components
1) Information, what it is about
2) Communication
3) Understanding
Communication already existed in antiquity.
LuhmannVsSpeech Act Theory: is the idea that this triad could be dismantled into acts. - Karl Bühler: all of them are only functions. ((s) Function/(s): Is not an act.)
>Speech act theory/Luhmann.
AU Cass 13
Communication/LuhmannVsHabermas: communication does not serve the creation of consensus. - If that does not work, it is simply declared the norm and claimed "it was supposed to be like that." But we should not turn an impossibility into a standard.
>Communication/Habermas.
SchelskyVsHabermas: Does communication stop when this goal is reached?
Solution/Luhmann: communication is not an act which would have to be brought under a standard - only communicating is action.
Communication is open when viewed without additions like truth. - We can also say "no". - On the other hand, we do not have the opportunity to start all over again.
Without any authority it is impossible.. - "No" does not terminate communication.
Communication could only be terminated by misunderstanding.
Communication ensues when"yes" and "no" are not yet decided.
- - -
AU Cass 12
Speech act Theory/Language/Communication/LuhmannVsSpeech Act Theory: Language use is not an act. - You always need understanding, so it goes on.
Action: would only be a release without understanding.
LuhmannVsHabermas: therefore, no theory of communicative action is possible.
>Communicative action, >Communication theory.
Speech: here the receiver is initially excluded. He comes only later as a disciplining moment in the theory. - And as a subject.
>Language/Luhmann, >Subject/Luhmann.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.