Lexicon of Arguments

Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
I XIV
Classes/Concepts/Gödel: can be construed as real objects, namely as "multiplicities of things" and concepts as properties or relations of things that exist independently of our definitions and constructions - which is just as legitimate as the assumption of physical bodies - they are as necessary for mathematics as they are for physics.
>Platonism, >Universals, >Mathematical entities, cf. >Hartry Field's Antiplatonism.
I XVIII
Set/Gödel: realistic: classes exist, circle fault no fault, not even if it is seen constructivistically. But Gödel is a non-constructivist.
Russell: classes are only facon de parler, only class names, term, no real classes.
I XVIII
Class names/Russell: eliminate through translation rules.
I XVIII
Classes/Principia Mathematica(1)/PM/Russell/Gödel: Principia do without classes, but only if one assumes the existence of a concept whenever one wants to construct a class - E.g. "red" or "colder" must be regarded as real objects.
I 37
Class/Principia Mathematica/Russell: The class formed by the function jx^ is to be represented by z^ (φ z) - E.g. if φ x is an equation, z^ (φ z) will be the class of its roots - Example if φ x means: "x has two legs and no feathers", z^ (φ z) will be the class of the humans.
I 120
Class/Principia Mathematica/Russell: incomplete symbol.
>Incomplete symbols.
Function: Complete Symbol - therefore no transitivity when classes are inserted for variables -
E.g. x = y . x = z . > . y = z (transitivity) is a propositional function which always applies.
But not if we insert a class for x and functions for y and z. - E.g. "z^ (φ z) = y ! z^" is not a value of "x = y" - because classes are incomplete symbols.

1. Whitehead, A.N. and Russel, B. (1910). Principia Mathematica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- - -
Flor III 117
Classes/sets/things/objects/Russell/Flor: sets must not be seen as things - otherwise, we would always have also 2n things at n things (combinations - i.e. we would have more things than we already have - Solution: Eliminate class symbols from expressions - instead designations for propositional functions.
>Quine: Class Abstraction.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.