Lexicon of Arguments

Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
I 88
PeacockVsInstrumentalism.
Peacocke per separation observation terms/theoretical terms.
>Instrumentalism, >Observation terms, >Theoretical terms.
If X-ray tubes and Geiger counters are distinguished, then in the representational content - then we have observation terms instead of theoretical terms.
>Content, >Representational Content, >Empirical Content.
I 94
Observation Terms/Instruments/Peacocke: E.g. Square: if presented at different angles, it is epistemically impossible that it is not a square.
E.g. a pair of particles: here it is still epistemically possible that it is not the result of a collision.
That always requires faith in observability, therefore circular if the belief exists and ineffective if the belief does not exist.
>Circularity, >Belief, >Observability, >Unobservables.
In contrast, none of both if it comes to understanding instead of truth.
>Understanding, >Truth.
I 104
Theoretical Terms/TT/Observation term/concept/theory/instrument/experiment/Peacocke: improved tools give us no new concepts.
>Concepts.
Peacocke Thesis: theoretical terms are always connected to observation terms - e.g. a blind, to whom a device writes information about spatial environment on the back: how should the blind test the device?
>Knowledge, >World/Thinking, >Perception, >Certainty,
>Confirmation, >Verification.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.