Lexicon of Arguments

Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
IX 217
Induction/Quine: problem: because of the deceptive infinity/finity: problem of uniqueness of subtraction: it is only then clear if a natural number n is proved to be L, because no class has enough elements (namely n) to be candidate for an element of n in question.
Solution: we must show that any natural number can turn out in this way as Λ, in short that Λ ε N. Problem: can we prove it in New Foudations? Granted, ϑ ε ϑ, admitted in ϑ there are infinitely many elements Λ, {Λ], {{Λ}}, ... which are all different, but the proof is not possible.
>Infinity, >Provability.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.