Strawson V 211
Transcendental Idealism/StrawsonVsKant: non-empirical knowledge/Kant: geometric knowledge - but only when the analysis is complete.
>
Knowledge/Kant.
StrawsonVs: this premise does not make more than the definition of the conditions to be explored - that means, they do not depend on the transcendental idealism. And if the premise is not dependent on him, then the evidence is not either - and thus also not the whole non-empirical knowledge.
N.B.: it is not necessary to invoke the doctrine that what we perceive as objects, are no such objects in reality.
V 213
Def Phenomenalistic Idealism: the claim that physical things are not independent of our perceptions. - Definition Problematic Idealism: claims that the assumption of external objects is only a conclusion from internal perception. - KantVs: this presupposes what is wrong, namely that bodies exist independently of our perception - what is wrong is the transcendental idealism. (KantVsTranscendental Idealism)
V 222
Transcendental Idealism/Kant: claims it is an empiricist realism. Confidence must include an awareness of specific awareness-independent objects.
StrawsonVsKant: this is certainly a dualistic realism - this dualism questions the "our".
---
Stroud I 129f
Def Dogmatic Idealism/Kant/Stroud: the thesis that there is no world besides mine - KantVs: that would be a statement about the world we want to investigate: that is absurd.
Stroud I 130
Def Problematic Idealism: Thesis: that the independent world from us was unknowable.
KantVs: that misinterprets our actual situation in the world.
Cf. >
Thing in itself/Kant.
---
Adorno XIII 58
Transcendental Idealism/Kant/Adorno: Kant is a transcendental idealist in the sense that he believes that the judgments which we can make as valid judgments about the empirical world are constituted by the original forms of our consciousness, but that the world, so constituted once, as one already constituted, in which we live, is precisely the world which forms the object of our experiences; of its empirical reality, we must be convinced, because the forms of organization by which they are transcendental (...) must always refer to a material which itself is derived from experience.
KantVsPlato/Adorno: there is a critique of (Platonic) ideas in this.
Adorno: in this sense, he is one of the great executors of the overall nominalistic tradition of the modern Enlightenment.
>
Nominalism, >
Enlightenment.
