Lexicon of Arguments

 Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
VI 205
Rabbit-Duck-Illusion/Seeing Aspects/Wittgenstein/Schulte: even with a picture puzzle we always "see" the same. But there are probably also different ways. > Interpretation, > seeing. Seeing is not an act but a condition. Introspection does not help change the shape. >Introspektion.
Rabbit-Duck-Head/Seeing Aspects/Picture Puzzle/Wittgenstein/Schulte: even with a picture puzzle we "see" the same thing, for example the same tree, until we discover the thief in the foliage.
VI 206
Am I seeing something else now, or am I just interpreting what I see in different ways?
I am inclined to say the former, but why?
Interpreting: is action!
Seeing: is no action, but a condition! (BPP § 1).
Introspection does not help when changing shapes.
VI 207
The aspect is not something that needs to be hidden away from the communication. >Deception, >Seeing.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.