Lexicon of Arguments

Complaints - Corrections

Table

Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?

Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page

/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*

or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 

I 57
Nagel: the validity of thoughts does not depend on how they are used!
>Use theory/Nagel,
Validity: meaning is just still not vailidity.
>Objectivity/Nagel,
>Language/Nagel.
I 65
The fallacy lies in the idea you could "get out" of the thougt "add two" and see it as a naturalistically descibable event.
You can not consider the thought "add two" separately from its contents, and then ask what the content is.
>Description/Nagel.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.