Lexicon of Arguments

Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
IV 59
Epistemic: e.g. the situation of radical interpretation is epistemic.
IV 105
Epistemic/Fodor/Lepore: what made the arguments of the previous chapters epistemic was the assumption that it is metaphysically constitutive for content that language must be radically interpretable.
E.g. the question of which sentences a speaker holds to be true and under what conditions.
Language/Davidson: language must be radically interpretable.
Contrast: transcendental,
>Radical interpretation, Cf. >Immanence, >Analyticity/syntheticity.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.