Lexicon of Arguments

 Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
Graeser I 146
QuineVsCarnap: (Holism): since theory is only debatable as a whole, theoretical terms escape the reduction to sensual terms. But: Empiricism/Quine: is not a strict opponent. How else is knowledge of the world possible?
>Theoretical Terms/Quine.
Quine VII (b) 40ff
Empiricism/Quine: empiricism has excessively rich ontology. Science is double dependent on language and experience, but thesis: this duality cannot be traced back to individual statements.
XII 90/1
Empiricism/Quine pro:
1) everything that speaks for scientific theories comes from experience
2) every word meaning is ultimately based on experience
XII 94
One has abandoned the following methods: 1) trying to explain everything from sensory data - 2) the rational reconstruction.
Stalnaker I 3
QuineVsEmpiricism/Two Dogmas/Stalnaker: empiricism is no basis for the distinction between language rules (rules) and our judgments about the world - no theory - neutral basis.
>Two Dogmas/Quine.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.