Lexicon of Arguments

 

Graeser I 163
Particulars/Strawson: Particulars have priority in our conceptual system - ability to attribute consciousness to predicates necessary. Condition for them for physical predicates.
>Attribution, >Physical/psychic, >Introduction/Strawson.
Graeser I 224
Strawson: These particulars take precedence of processes or events that we could not identify without them.
>Identification/Strawson, >Individuation/Strawson.
---
Newen I 150
VsStrawson/Newen/Schrenk: why should just particulars be the most fundamental reference objects of subject terms and not events? - Strawson: because objects are recognizable after some time - his arguments are transcendental.
---
Strawson I 35ff
Particular/Strawson: as long as it is isolated from the rest of the knowledge, we can learn nothing new about it.
I 51
Particular/Strawson: is there a class of particular on which all others depend? - Maybe dependent "private particular".
Elementary: Class of People.
Tradition: private particular: "Emotions" fundamental.
I 52
Principium indivduationis/Strawson: is based on identity of persons.
I 70
Particular/Strawson: material bodies: fundamental for the identification - not for process - StrawsonVsRussell: not biography instead of the names.
>Acquaintance.
I 72
Description of particular does not force to mention the process - but identification dependency of processes of the particulars in which they take place - because things require space, processes not always.
>Space/Strawson, cf. >Process-ontology.
I 175
Particular/properties/Strawson: one cannot only refer identifying to particulars - VsTradition: therefore object character is not a criterion for particulars.
I 176
RamseyVs
Particular/properties/RamseyVsTradition: from the fact that two things are linked, it does not follow that they must have different characters.
>Reference/Strawson, >Particularization/Ramsey.
Strawson:
1. grammatical criterion for distinguishing between things and activities
2. categorical criterion.