Lexicon of Arguments

Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
Brandom I 232
Language/Thinking/Davidson: "Neither the language nor thinking can be complete within the meaning of the other and none of them has a conceptual primacy in explanations." >Language and thought, >World/Thinking.
- - -
McDowell I 38
Thinking/Davidson: The thinking is not exposed to external control, is only exposed to an external causal influence. >Causal theory of knowledge.
McDowell I 42
McDowellVsDavidson: This rejects that thoughts and ideas are linked in a rational way. McDowell: but then we do not get an empirical content. (The views are blind, (Kant) without concepts).
- - -
Davidson I (e) 101ff
Thinking/Davidson: There are no "objects of thought" as ghostly beings on the model of sense-data, or the like. >Objects of thought, >Objects of belief.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.