Lexicon of Arguments

Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
I 163
Monad/Strawson: simplest form: the concept of an x, that... - but not determined by the relative clause, but the concept of these things.
E.g. the concept of a person who has killed a man: Universal, but no monad. Because it is not a complete concept.
>Universals, >Complete concept.
Strawson: in the real world a complete description is completely meaningless.
>Description, >Completeness, >Situation, >Fact.
I 164
Complete Concept/Leibniz/Strawson: classes can be formed from complete descriptions if the descriptions given by the relative clause contain in both cases identical, but differently arranged elements.
>Relative clause.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.