Lexicon of Arguments

 

I 66
Naturalization of content: naturalization of content is the separation of consciousness and intentionality (SearleVs)
SearleVsPutnam/Searle: meanings are in the head (> Intentionality/Searle).
---
II 25 ff
Meanings are in the head (VsPutnam) because perception is self-related. Perception provides self fulfilling conditions.
>Putnam: Meanings are "not in the head".
II 255
Meaning/Searle: meaning is in the head, fulfilling conditions are in the intentionality. Putnam: they are not in the head, conditions in the world have a crucial indexical determination; it is not the concept which fixes the meaning. Searle: meaning is not determined by ideolect. - > Elm/beech example, > Twin Earth.
---
V 69
Meaning goes beyond the intention. It is usually a matter of convention.
V 68
Chess/Searle: the figures usually have no meaning, and who makes a move usually means nothing.
>Chess, >Chess figures/Wittgenstein.
---
IV 157
Meaning/Searle: meaning depends on the context - like other non-conventional succession of forms of intentionality.
>Context dependence.
IV 159
Ultimately, meaning depends on our perception as a basic form of intentionlity.