Lexicon of Arguments

 

IV 101
Attributive/Tradition/Grammar: attributive includes relative expressions such as "large" or "hot". Searle: we require background. All tall women are similar in terms of height. Attributive/Searle: what is meant and the sentence meaning are the same thing.
IV 161
Referential/Donnellan/Searle: S talked about e, no matter if e is actually F. You can then also report with other expressions than "the F". Attributive: here there is no entity e, the speaker would not even have had in mind that they existed. Attributive: the statement can then not be true.
IV 164
Donnellan: E.g. "The winner, whoever it is": here, in the attributive sense nothing is actually talked about. Referential/attributive: there is no distinction between beliefs.
IV 165ff
Referential/Attributive/SearleVsDonnellan: instead: aspects: you can choose the aspect under which you speak about an object.
Primary A: if nothing satisfies it, the speaker had nothing in mind (hallucination).
Secondary A: any aspect for which it is true that S tried to talk with it about the object, that fulfils its primary A, without being meant to belong to the truth conditions.
>">Truth condition, >Aspects/Searle.
The Champagne example even works if water is in the glass. Searle: then the statement may also be true. The meaning does not change if no other aspect could assume the role of the primary one.
IV 175
Referential/Searle: the referential brings the secondary aspect. Attributive: brings the primary aspect.
IV 176
Both readings can be intensional and extensional.
>Intension, >Extension.
IV 175
What is meant is decisive. Difference sentence/finding: finding is decided, a sentence is not (what was said literally).
>Meaning(Intending), >Intention, >Speaker intention.