Lexicon of Arguments

 Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
II 209
KripkeVsDonnellan: Donnellan's theory is correct, but does not refute Russell's (better, because more consistent) theory. The distinction referential/attributive has nothing to do with distinction de re/de dicto (Donnellan ditto).
>de re, >de dicto.
II 236f
Referential/attributive/KripkeVsDonnellan: the distinction between speaker reference and semantic reference is needed anyway, it is sufficient instead of the distinction referential/attributive. E.g. the real husband is irrelevant. I might not have confused two people - I just believe that a person has a property that it lacks in reality.
II 222
E.g. "Her husband is kind to her"/Linsky/Kripke: problem with the statement: is it true? The use cannot be analyzed here, only the meanings of the sentence. In the referential use it is unclear what is meant by "statement".
>Donnellan.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.