Lexicon of Arguments

Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
II 238 f
Analyticity, blurred: a better explanation: that our language conventions, as previously assumed here, are not a precise convention of truth and trust in one language.
It is, rather, for an arbitrarily selected language from a whole bunch of similar languages.
>Convention/Lewis.
II 239f
Of a bundle of similar languages ​​that contain more or less the same sentences that have more or less the same truth values ​​in the worlds that are close to our real world.
We can eliminate the uncertainties that arise here as we want.
Analyticity is then sharp in each language of our bundle.
II 239
Blurred analyticity/Lewis: thesis: our language is selected at random from a bunch of similar languages ​​that contain more or less the same sentences. They have more or less the same truth value in similar possible worlds. Then we have a space of languages. Analyticity is then sharp in each language. If different languages do not match ​​regarding the analyticity, the sentence is not just analytical.
---
Schwarz I 220
Analytical/analyticity/Lewis/Schwarz: neither theories nor their individual sentences are analytic, but rather their >Carnap Conditional.
Analyticity: you could try further to explain blurred analyticity by the fact that it reminds us that we do not know whether certain worlds are indeed possible.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.