Correction: (max 500 charact.)
The complaint will not be published.
Strawson V 102
Analogies of Experience/Kant: We do not find them in the axioms of intuition.
"Experiences are only possible with the idea of a necessary connection of perceptions". - Transcendental Aesthetic/Kant: Principles of sensibility a priori.
Transcendental Analytic: comprises the deduction of the categories, the schematism and the principles.
Strawson V 104
Analogy: Shows how the order of the perceptions must be represented with the terms - Kant brilliantly reduces it on temporal relations - 1. between the objects 2. between the experiences.
Strawson V 105
1. Analogy/Kant: the quantum of substance in nature can be neither reduced nor increased.
>Substance.
V 106
Time/Kant: All determination of time presupposes something permanent. Only space is persistent.
Strawson V 107
StrawsonVsKant: That is not a reason for the objective order to be spatial.
Strawson V 108
StrawsonVsKant: There is no need for a conservation principle! Only a re-identification principle for loci (objects). - Nowadays: We see that something burns while no substance remains.
Strawson V 112
2./3. Analogy/Kant: Question: Could perceptions also have occurred reversely? a) Events: No time indifference b) Object: time difference
Strawson V 115
2. Analogy: The order of the sequence is not only necessary, but also specific, bound by our apprehensions. Causality: If the order is necessary, the change itself is necessary.
StrawsonvsKant: He unconsciously uses two terms of necessity here: conceptual/causal
Strawson V 116/117
3. Analogy/Kant: the interaction of simultaneously existing objects corresponds to a time indifference of perceptions.
Strawson: unlike causality.
>
Causality/Kant , >
Perception/Kant , >
Principles/Kant , >
Experience/Kant .