Lexicon of Arguments

Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
Rorty I 255
Similarity/Rorty: sufficient: the expectation system should be abstract and complicated in the same sense because the recognized identities are surprisingly independent from the physical uniformities of the stimuli among one another. >Stimuli.
---
Fodor IV 18f
Sameness/similarity/everyday language studies/intentionality/Fodor/Lepore: problem: in order to state similarity, identity must already have been defined. Problem: believing almost the same: requires countability and identity of beliefs, e.g. when someone asks you a color, you would answer something like "red". Problem: we have no idea what the truth conditions would be for these generalizations! Therefore, we cannot do without identity in favor of an equality solution: we need a yet-to-be-found stricter concept of similarity (with respect to beliefs or semantic entities) ((s)> VsAnalyticity).
Holism: if he is right, the concept "token of the same type" is defined only if all beliefs are shared. Problem: they are almost of the same type. >Holism.
IV 123
Similarity/functional role/causal/association/Hume/Fodor/Lepore: analog: what a mental picture reminds you of does not depend on what role it plays in mental processes. Hume: but the causal role depends on what the image is associated with; and an idea (imagination) can easily be associated with anything that is consistent with its content. Conclusion: the truth conditions are independent of the causal role. Hume is not a functionalist in terms of content. Fodor/Lepore: no one believes today, that the content of a representation depends on what it reminds someone of. Only exception: is connectionism. >Connectionism.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.