@misc{Lexicon of Arguments,
title = {Quotation from: Lexicon of Arguments – Concepts - Ed. Martin Schulz, 29 Mar 2024},
author = {Lorenzen,Paul},
subject = {Knowledge},
note = {Wessel I 346
Modality/Lorenzen/Wessel: it is assumed a certain group of people has accepted a certain system of statements W as true. From these people, all statements which follow logical from these statements are then recognized as true.
>Dialogical logic, cf. >Logical omniscience, cf. >Scorekeeping model.
Lorenzen regards this as meaningful only for future statements.
Knowledge/Lorenzen/Wessel: for Lorenzen, it follows that everything we know is necessary with regard to this knowledge.
>Necessity.
Tradition: For example, if we know that in a pea pod are five peas and that it contains protein. This is only the second necessary knowledge. According to Lorenzen, both statements are necessary knowledge. (WesselVsLorenzen).
>Facts, >Contingency.
Modality/WesselVsLorenzen: too broad a view. That all knowledge is supposed to be necessary is a "fatalistic consequence".
>Fatalism.},
note = { Lorn I P. Lorenzen Constructive Philosophy Cambridge 1987
Wessel I H. Wessel Logik Berlin 1999 },
file = {http://philosophy-science-humanities-controversies.com/listview-details.php?id=797248}
url = {http://philosophy-science-humanities-controversies.com/listview-details.php?id=797248}
}