@misc{Lexicon of Arguments, title = {Quotation from: Lexicon of Arguments – Concepts - Ed. Martin Schulz, 28 Mar 2024}, author = {Lakatos,Imre}, subject = {Texts}, note = {Hacking I 212 Lakatos: you should read all the texts you can get hold of. Hacking and FeyerabendVsLakatos: this is an elitist demand! HackingVsCoherence theory: you can always fiddle the data situation! One can conclude that something is not an example! This does not mean that you are lying! >Coherence theory, >Coherence. But that withdraws the basics from Lakatos's historical analysis! According to Lakatos, we cannot rely on any other standards than the cognitive history as it is present. >History/Lakatos. FeyerabendVsLakatos: elitist. Rationality is simply defined by what is approved by a community. (Here, however, only the last 200 years). I 215 Lakatos/Hacking: Lakatos has attempted to characterize certain objective values of science without reference to copy theories of truth. (Increase in knowledge). >Science/Lakatos, >Progress, >Objectivity/Lakatos.}, note = { Laka I I. Lakatos The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes: Volume 1: Philosophical Papers (Philosophical Papers (Cambridge)) Cambridge 1980 Hacking I I. Hacking Representing and Intervening. Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science, Cambridge/New York/Oakleigh 1983 German Edition: Einführung in die Philosophie der Naturwissenschaften Stuttgart 1996 }, file = {http://philosophy-science-humanities-controversies.com/listview-details.php?id=768361} url = {http://philosophy-science-humanities-controversies.com/listview-details.php?id=768361} }