@misc{Lexicon of Arguments, title = {Quotation from: Lexicon of Arguments – Concepts - Ed. Martin Schulz, 29 Mar 2024}, author = {Anscombe,G. E. M.}, subject = {Pronouns}, note = {Frank I 78 I/Anscombe: if it is not a proper name, it is obvious to assign it to the pronouns. But this is not said at all because "pronoun" is a "lump sack category", under which one can subsume everything. >Names, >I, Ego, Self. Frank I 94 I/name/pronoun/grammar/reference/Anscombe: if "I" is not a name, there are words that function like names, e.g. pronouns. Could "I" be a pronoun? This would be meaningless, because it is too undefined. Pronouns: can also be variables: E.g. "If someone says this, he is a fool". This cannot be an identification of an object. >Variables. E.g. lie: the meaning of "I am not E.A." Is hardly preserved in the sentence "E.A. is not E.A"! >Self-reference, >Reference, >Contradictions. E.g. demonstrative pronoun "this": assumes that we know the answer to the question "this what?" . If so, we have a functioning logical subject. >Demonstratives.}, note = { Anscombe I G.E. M. Anscombe "The First Person", in: G. E. M. Anscombe The Collected Philosophical Papers, Vol. II: "Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Mind", Oxford 1981, pp. 21-36 In Analytische Theorien des Selbstbewusstseins, Manfred Frank, Frankfurt/M. 1994 Fra I M. Frank (Hrsg.) Analytische Theorien des Selbstbewusstseins Frankfurt 1994 }, file = {http://philosophy-science-humanities-controversies.com/listview-details.php?id=762149} url = {http://philosophy-science-humanities-controversies.com/listview-details.php?id=762149} }