@misc{Lexicon of Arguments, title = {Quotation from: Lexicon of Arguments – Concepts - Ed. Martin Schulz, 29 Mar 2024}, author = {Plato}, subject = {Appearance}, note = {Bubner I 50 Appearance/Plato: must be understood as the being of nothingness. Thus further problematizations are necessary in order to put the initial question in further dimensions. This makes the conflict with Parmenides inevitable: Bubner I 51 Being/Parmenides: had forbidden to attribute a being to non-being. >Existence/Parmenides, >Appearance/Parmenides, >Existence predicate/Parmenides. Being/Appearance/PlatoVsParmenides: the solution of the problem of being has to be re-established, in memory of the linguistic nature of the concept. Only in language can the concept of being express what it means, and also the concept of being is only meaningful in propositions. >Proposition, >Statement. Bubner I 97 Appearance/Plato/Bubner: is due to the peculiar structure of the speech to be able to link intolerable elements in the sentence together. Bubner I 98 Sophistes/Plato: It is not a step into the empiricism. Instead, one can see from the connection of the elements "Theaitetos sits" and "Theaitetos flies" that "man" and "sit", but not "man" and "fly" match. The respective "eidos" is to be examined in the logos analysis to see if they can co-exist. >Logos, >Predication, cf. >Empiricism.}, note = { Bu I R. Bubner Antike Themen und ihre moderne Verwandlung Frankfurt 1992 }, file = {http://philosophy-science-humanities-controversies.com/listview-details.php?id=477996} url = {http://philosophy-science-humanities-controversies.com/listview-details.php?id=477996} }